Abstract
We develop a model of pork-barrel politics in which a government official tries to improve her reelection chances by spending on targeted interest groups. The spending signals that she shares their concerns. We investigate the effect of such pandering on the public deficit. Pandering widens the deficit relative to a non-accountable official (one who does not have to run for reelection) if either the official’s overall spending propensity is known, or if it is unknown but the effect of spending on the deficit is opaque to voters. By contrast, an unknown spending propensity may induce the elected official to exhibit fiscal discipline if the deficit is transparent.
Keywords
Accountability; pandering; deficit bias; redistributive politics; budget caps;
JEL codes
- H1: Structure and Scope of Government
- H7: State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations
- K4: Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
See also
Published in
Journal of Public Economics, vol. 176, August 2019, pp. 79–93